Showing posts with label Jonathan Raban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jonathan Raban. Show all posts

Monday, January 3, 2022

Jonathan Raban to Murray, 27 June 1994 -- "loveliest village on the plain"

Here Jonathan Raban applies his literary erudition to boomtown building in the American West. He was working on "Bad Land" (published in 1996), an exploration of the early twentieth-century homesteading experience in eastern Montana, where American optimism and railroad promotions combined to create communities that were destined to wither in arid reality. One of them was Ismay, Montana, which was briefly notorious for informally renaming itself "Joe, Montana," in 1993, and more recently made the news for returning its federal COVID stimulus funding. The mayor of the community of approximately 17 people explained that as the town has no municipal water supply, no paved roads, and no sewer system, it had no real use for the proffered first installment of $4,853.35.

Raban also wondered about the south King County town of Auburn, which has not dwindled like Ismay, though neither has it become the "loveliest village of the plain." He was correct that it gets its name from the Goldsmith poem. That was after the original name, Slaughter, in commemoration of a Lt. William A. Slaughter who was killed in the "Indian War" of 1856, was determined to be a curb on growth.

Dear Murray,

This is a scribbled postscript to a party here on August 3rd, ...

In the meantime I have a thought/query. I've lately been nagged by the question of just how well-known in the West was Oliver Goldsmith's poem "The Deserted Village", with its idealised picture of rural life. I remember the first time I drove past Auburn, and wondered idly if its name might be an allusion to the poem ("Sweet Auburn, loveliest village of the plain..."), and the memory was cranked up the other day, when I was Ismay, MT (and the scene of Percy Wollaston's memoir) and read the first issue of The Ismay, published in 1908, which had a booster-poem on its front page whose last four lines go as follows:

...Long may she thrive while countless homes do stand

on such abundant and fertile land.

While natives listen at eve's alluring strains,

Blest little Ismay, youngest city of the plains!

Well, the author of that one clearly has a memory of Goldsmith somewhere in his or her head, as several earlier lines confirm.

It makes good sense to me that when the railroad companies and the government got into the business of village-making between abut 1880 and 1914, Goldsmith's poem would have made a nice piece of propaganda. In his version of things, landlordism, the spread of the great estates and the enclosure acts were destroying the pastoral life of rural England.

 

Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey,

Where wealth accumulates and men decay.

But in democratic America (or so I imagine the gist of the propaganda), one could turn the clock back and reconstruct the kind of rural idyll that had largely died in undemocratic England in the eighteenth century. Sweet Auburn redivivus! Blest little Ismay! If one has Goldsmith on one hand and Percy Wollaston in the other, quite an interesting chime is struck, I think, between the two. If there's something to this, then some of the mental energy and picture-building that went into the homesteading movement came from an odd, very American version of rural nostalgia.

The irony is, of course, that no lovely villages have ever been more rapidly deserted than those of the Badlands and western plains. Goldsmith would have been appalled by the rise of the ranch over the homestead and by the way in which the homestead acts were exploited by the timber, mining, and railroad corporations, who managed to make the activities of the English landlords look like very small beer indeed. 

 

The rich man's joys increase, the poor's decay...

There are several Auburns scattered over the U.S.; some, like the one in New York, may well predate the Goldsmith poem. But I do wonder whether the Auburns of WA, California and Nebraska, for instance, consciously set out to recreate the loveliest village of the plain.

 

Where then, ah where, shall poverty reside,

to 'scape the pressure of contiguous pride?

 ...asks Goldsmith; and, some 100 years later, courtesy of the railroad companies, comes the answer--why, western Washington, or eastern Montana...

Now you'll tell me that Auburn was named after one Hiram Aloysius Auburn, otherwise known as the Green River Timber King. But I'd love to believe that it got its name from someone thinking of "The Deserted Village" -- and thinking that a village in the far West might enjoy the innocence long lost by its counterparts in England.

Crabbe's response to Goldsmith ("The Village") is much the better poem; and funny, too, with his castigation of the stupidity and brutishness of rural life. I love his description of the villages as "sedately torpid and devoutly dumb". If only the homesteaders had read Crabbe instead, an enormous amount of human misery might have been spared.

No need to respond to this--and certainly not in writing. But next time we speak, will you burst my balloon on the naming of Auburn, or leave it intact?

My feet are in agony. I'm wearing in a pair of new snakeboots in preparation for my second visit to Ismay, where three weeks ago I spent most of my time walking through the buffalo grass like a heron on hot bricks. There were rattlesnakes galore. But I am totally bewitched by that extraordinary landscape -- maybe because it is nearly as alien and solitary as the ocean. Poor old Wollastons (and all their neighbors).

My best,

Jonathan

Thursday, December 2, 2021

Jonathan Raban, 1 December 1997 -- "a chance to say something about your work"

 

 Jonathan Raban and Murray admired each other's Northwest writing in part because of their divergent perspectives as a newcomer and a native son along with their sense of a region as part of a much bigger set of forces.

 

I hear today that Bad Land is to be given the prize awarded in your name by the Tacoma Public Library. I am honored; not least because it will give me a chance to say something about your work, and how it bravely explodes the rather condescending notion of "local history". One of the things I have steadily admired about your writing, since I began to read you in 1989, is how you give American history a specific locale, in the Northwest, without ever allowing Northwestern experience to seem parochial, provincial, regional, merely "local"; but rather seeing your own home turf as a stage on which the large forces of nineteenth and twentieth century history are continually in play. 

So many people, including the bulk of "local historians", feel excluded from history-proper, which is imagined to happen in some great elsewhere, whose center is London, or Paris, or Moscow, or Washington, D.C.--with the inevitable consequence that the tone of most local history veers between the apologetic, the boastful, the special-pleading boosterish. (Cf. Nard Jones...); just history, firmly placed in latitude and longitude, full of local details, as particular, and as rich in general implication, as a novel. the Seattle I live in now is still to a very large extent the imagined city that I found in the pages of your book. 

This is a verbose way of saying that the Murray Morgan Prize means a great deal to me--and, rare among literary prizes, it has real meaning. It says something important about writing and locality, and how writing which is rooted in the local need--and should--not be "local writing".



Tuesday, August 1, 2017

To Howard and Judith Daniel, Feb. 3 1987 -- The "primitive simplicity" of prewar football (and a postwar addendum)

Murray felt indebted the rest of his life for all he learned from his friendship with Howard and Judith Daniel, whom he and Rosa met in Bucharest in 1939. They introduced a smart, bookish, but provincial young man to political, artistic, and intellectual worlds he had not encountered.  In return, he did his best to explain one of his enduring passions, American college football.

   

 
 
 
Thursday, Dec 3 '92, to Bill Betts

...I was slipped two presidents box tickets to the UW-Oregon State game by Fred Haley, who hates football. I was going to take Mary (Adams) but she felt the steps would be too much for her knees. So I took Jonathan Raban, the British writer who has adopted Seattle. His first game. Lots of questions. Not much enthusiasm for the nuances, but did come up with a fine remark. He'd asked if there were Oregon State supporters in the crowd of 70,000. I said a few, and pointed to the orange sweatered bunch in the curved end of the bowl. He stared, then said "No barricades?" I said that there were occasional after-game skirmishes around the goal posts but we had not imported the Brit/Yurrup idea of war in the stands. He paused, then said "American football is so gentle."